Disclaimer

It’s about nutrition contains articles on many health topics; however, no warranty is made that any of the articles are accurate. There is absolutely no assurance that any statement contained or cited in an article touching on health matters is true, correct, precise, or up-to-date. The overwhelming majority of such articles are not written, in part or in whole, by a qualified medical practitioner. Even if a statement made about health or medicine is accurate, it may not apply to you or your symptoms.

The health information provided on it’s about nutrition is, at best, of a general nature of opinion and cannot substitute for the advice of a medical professional (for instance, a qualified doctor/physician, nurse, pharmacist/chemist, and so on). It’s about nutrition is not a doctor nor a dietitian.

None of the individual contributors, system operators, developers, sponsors of it’s about nutrition nor anyone else connected to it’s about nutrition can take any responsibility for the results or consequences of any attempt to use or adopt any of the information presented on this web site.

Nothing on it’s about nutrition should be construed as an attempt to offer or render a medical opinion or otherwise engage in the practice of medicine or dietetics.

Note about references and citations

In all included articles, every attempt is made to reference research material available to substantiate the article content. There are many limitations with this:

  1. The overwhelming majority of scientific literature is not open for public view without paying a fee per view.
  2. It’s about nutrition receives no funding or income from the articles, and therefore is unable to finance the purchase of research articles.
  3. Some references will be based on commentary from other articles or by viewing the abstract only – this is problematic, because it relies on someone else’s interpretation of the study results.
  4. The articles in it’s about nutrition are not systematic reviews – therefore the science papers included have not been selected in a robust and systematic fashion – they have been picked from searches in PubMed, Google Scholar or Cochrane Library.
  5. All papers cited have been selected and read by the author only, this exposes the risk of bias and thus these articles should not be used for academic referencing (you can, however, follow the links and use those in your citations).